COZBY ENTERPRISES, INC.

A Montana Corporation formed for research, design, and development of advanced steam engines for automobiles and other applications. 

P. O. Box 1104

Anaconda, Montana 59711 (U.S.A.)

Email:

fbcanaconda@yahoo.com

Telephone: (406) 563-5186

Cell Phone: (406) 560-0118

John Cozby

Ken Cozby

Jay Spillers

Cozby Enterprises, Inc. (hereafter Cozby), has no control over how the information found on this website, cozincmtusa.com, may be used and the reader makes use of the information on this website at his own risk.  Cozby gives notice that any information contained herein shall not create any warranty, express or implied, nor that the various devices, plans, drawings, mechanical systems or data shall be fit or useful for any particular purpose.  Statements are informational and for educational purposes only and not made or given as a warranty of the data in any way.  The reader shall be solely responsible for determining the accuracy and adequacy of the data for any and all uses to which the reader shall apply the data. 

We thank yahoo for hosting this website.

Mock-Up Complete, see site 16-16(pictues) and site 21(Articles)

August 8, 2016.

Pictured below are the Officers of Cozby Enterprises, Inc.

Left to Right:   John Cozby, Lewis Cozby, David Cozby, Jay Spillers, and Kenneth Cozby

COZBY ENTERPRISES, INC.
(cozincmtusa.com)

U. S.  ENGINE , INC.

Principal Officers:  —

President, Chief Executive Officer 
           John A. Cozby
           306 W. 5th. St.
           P.O. Box 1104
           Anaconda, MT 59711
               Phone: (406)563-5186
               Cell: (406)560-0118
                   Email: fbcanaconda@msn.com
Main areas of responsibility: General oversight, design, planning, policy, property, fabrication, innovation, research

Vice-President, Secretary/Treasurer /Coordinator
      Kenneth R. Cozby
      607 Idaho
      Deer Lodge , MT 59722
          Phone: (406)846-3150
          Cell: (406)560-0742    

 Main areas of respo-nsibility: Comptroller, corporate finance, corporate relations, personnel, human resources, contracts, coordinating, design, fabrication, innovation, research

Vice-President, Public Relations 
         R. Lewis Cozby
         901 Oneil St
         Deer Lodge, MT 59722
           Phone:(406)846-1028
           Cell: (406)560-6487
Main areas of responsibility: Public affairs officer, communications, information, public relations, media, reporting, etc., design, fabrication, innovation, research

Vice-President, Design/Fabrication Oversight 
   R. David Cozby
   208 Clagett St
   Deer Lodge, MT 59722
        Phone:(406)846-0094
        Cell:(406)533-5654                                                                                 Main areas of responsibility: Research, development, implementation, fabrication, testing, innovation 

Vice-President, Website/Legal Affairs 
   Jay W. Spillers
   514 E. Commercial Ave
   Anaconda, MT 59711          Project 2013, Cozby Steam Engine:A Definitive StatementRev. – 9. 29.15;  3.6.16        John A. Cozby
A viable “Advanced Steam Engine” must be complex enough to achieve the required functions necessary for producing high efficiency and good performance. “Non-Advanced Steam Engines” are of little value. Steam at high pressure and high superheat has certain unique thermal qualities, characteristics, and capabilities which can realize an engine far superior to any internal combustion engine. An advanced steam engine must be able to take advantage of these unique attributes of extreme steam conditions. Such an engine is feasible, practical, and relatively simple and easy.
The Cozby steam engine (Project 2013, Jeep engine conversion to steam power) is designed to be, and is meant to be the world’s best, most advanced, and most sophisticated automotive engine.  The engine is based on many solid, practical,  proven, yet simple engineering principles integrated into a single unit to realize the greatest benefit. – Not “Just another engine”– Rather, a much superior engine design which will set the bar for the future of automotive engines.Reference: website: cozincmtusa.com (site 16 with sub sites 16's)
A few months ago my wife, Myrle, was asked by her boss, Teri; “What is John doing?”  When Myrle told her about our steam engine project, Teri said; “When I need a steam engine, I’ll go see John.”  What most people do not yet realize is that “everyone needs a steam engine.” Advanced Steam Engines have a lot to give.
SIX MAIN REASONS TO DEVELOP AN ADVANCED ENGINE1. Cleaner emissions and less emissions for better air quality2. Higher efficiency and higher mileage3. Highest degree of fuel diversity4. Excellent all around engine performance5. Quiet operation to reduce noise pollution6. Less emissions, better mileage, and fuel diversity to reduce the automotive                  carbon footprint to help slow global warming
General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Cummins, Caterpillar, Deere, or others could have done this many years ago if they had chosen to make the effort and the investment. The Department of Energy, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Defense, or the Environmental Protection Agency of our U.S. government could have done this many years ago if they had chosen to make the effort and the investment.
        Phone:(406)563-7193
        Cell: (406)559-0523
Main areas of responsibility: Website management, legal matters, contracts 

 Board of Directors: —   John Cozby (Chairman), Lewis Cozby, David Cozby, Kenneth Cozby, Jay Spillers, Timothy Hamm, Mary Lynn McKenna

                 Project 2013, Cozby Steam Engine:

A Definitive Statement

Rev.– 9. 29.15;  3.6.16        John A. Cozby

A viable “Advanced Steam Engine” must be complex enough to achieve the required functions necessary for producing high efficiency and good performance. “Non-Advanced Steam Engines” are of little value. Steam at high pressure and high superheat has certain unique thermal qualities, characteristics, and capabilities which can realize an engine far superior to any internal combustion engine. An advanced steam engine must be able to take advantage of these unique attributes of extreme steam conditions. Such an engine is feasible, practical, and relatively simple and easy.

The Cozby steam engine (Project 2013, Jeep engine conversion to steam power) is designed to be, and is meant to be the world’s best, most advanced, and most sophisticated automotive engine.  The engine is based on many solid, practical,  proven, yet simple engineering principles integrated into a single unit to realize the greatest benefit. – Not “Just another engine”– Rather, a much superior engine design which will set the bar for the future of automotive engines.Reference: website: cozincmtusa.com (site 16 with sub sites 16's)

A few months ago my wife, Myrle, was asked by her boss, Teri; “What is John doing?”  When Myrle told her about our steam engine project, Teri said; “When I need a steam engine, I’ll go see John.”  What most people do not yet realize is that “everyone needs a steam engine.” Advanced Steam Engines have a lot to give.

SIX MAIN REASONS TO DEVELOP AN ADVANCED ENGINE

1. Cleaner emissions and less emissions for better air quality

2. Higher efficiency and higher mileage

3. Highest degree of fuel diversity

4. Excellent all around engine performance

5. Quiet operation to reduce noise pollution

6. Less emissions, better mileage, and fuel diversity to reduce the automotive      carbon footprint to help slow global warming

General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Cummins, Caterpillar, Deere, or others could have done this many years ago if they had chosen to make the effort and the investment. The Department of Energy, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Defense, or the Environmental Protection Agency of our U.S. government could have done this many years ago if they had chosen to make the effort and the investment.

FULL   SCALE
MOCK-UP PRE-CONSTRUCTION( MODEL )
{ PATTERN }
FOR THEADVANCED
STEAM   ENGINE
For working prototype development

August 8, 2016 the mock up is now essentially complete refer to site 16-16(pictues) and site 21(Articles).

 The Need

      There is a need for reduced and cleaner emissions, wide fuel diversity, good performance, high efficiency and good fuel economy in automobile engines.  That the internal combustion gasoline engine is lacking in these areas and needs to be replaced with a better alternative has been well recognized and documented for many years.  A real green car is needed.

                                                                 The Situation

         Fifty years ago the amount of air pollution from automotive exhaust had become alarming and contributed significantly to the enactment of the "Clean Air Act". The root cause of automotive air pollution was the internal combustion gasoline engine. In 1966 the Cozby brothers committed to research and design for the most advanced type of steam engines for automobiles in order to reduce air pollution with special emphasis on high mileage, performance, and fuel diversity. In 1967 the U. S. Department of Commerce (DOC) called for a program, the Federal Government Alternative Automotive Power Systems Program , which was put under the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970 and then moved to the Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA). In April, 1977, ERDA published a report, "An Assessment of the Technology of Rankine Engines (steam engines) For Automobiles". This report called for a major program for advanced Rankine (steam) engine development.

        Under the Energy Research and Development Administration's Federal Government Alternative Automotive Power Systems Program various piston and turbine systems were built, tested, and evaluated. The most promising engine was a uniflow type piston engine using water (steam) as a working fluid built by Scientific Energy Systems Corporation (SES) under contract to ERDA. It was shown that steam engines were clean and fuel diverse, but the miles per gallon was disappointing. The piston steam engines of this era were of the simple single stage uniflow type. The operation of the uniflow steam engine is similar to a two-cycle internal combustion engine. The uniflow engine admits steam at the top of the cylinder and exhausts through ports at the bottom of the cylinder to the steam condenser.

       Scientific Energy Systems realized the limitations of their uniflow engine and recognized that in order to achieve high efficiency and high mileage a reheat type of advanced engine/system was required. Scientific Energy Systems did engineering analysis and design work for such an engine/system. The SES design was a two stage engine with a single reheat between the first and second stage. A reheat engine has more than one stage with steam re-heating between the separate stages. This type of system proved effective in the 1920's in locomobiles and marine engines. Some marine engines had as many as four stages and three reheats. Similar reheat systems are employed in modern efficient steam power plants with as many as four stages and two reheats. The number of stages and reheats is a function of the relationships between steam pressures, steam temperatures, and expansion ratios employed. Basically, the higher the initial pressure, the higher the temperatures, and the higher the ratio of expansion are the more efficient the engine/system becomes. Multiple stages also permit steam bleeding for feed water heating to further improve system efficiency. (The Cozby brothers had worked for years on this advanced approach before they received their copy of the ERDA report along with an official letter of reproof from the DOE. The Cozbys have continued to refine and improve their designs. The Cozbys' designs are based on a three stage engine with two reheats and a four stage engine with three reheats as a better approach than the SES design which used one reheat.) It is this type of reheat, multi-stage advanced Rankine engine development called for by the Energy Research and Development Administration for automobiles. This ERDA recommendation was not implemented by Congress.

     What happened is that Congress created the Department of Energy later in 1977. The new Department of Energy (DOE) absorbed the older Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) which had worked on steam engine development for about seven years. The Department of Commerce and the new Department of Energy then used the poor mileage of the single stage uniflow type of steam engines as their reason to kill the more efficient advanced reheat type of steam engine development. The Departments of Commerce and Energy reversed course and repudiated the clear recommendation of the Energy Research and Development Administration which called for a major program of advanced Rankine engine development. DOC and DOE misconstrued, contradicted, and ignored the important findings and conclusions of the ERDA report. The DOE claimed the ERDA report as "their" own report which they then proceeded to misinterpret. Congress followed the contrary DOC and DOE recommendation not to support further steam engine development. THE END

Postscript

      The above statements are not just "our opinion", but rather a matter of public record as well as accepted, demonstrated empirical steam practice. It is our opinion that few people are aware of what has happened. The evidence seems to indicate that the Departments of Commerce and Energy along with the automobile, engine, and oil industries persuaded Congress to abandon advanced steam engine development. It is our belief that the lack of advanced steam engine development has contributed to greater foreign oil dependence, poorer air quality, a larger Federal deficit, and adverse economic distress. It is our view that the decision not to support a major program of advanced Rankine/steam engine development was misguided at best and collusion at worst. (The automobile, engine, and oil industries have made it clear that they do not want advanced steam engines to be developed.) It should be recognized that there are good reasons for following the original recommendation of the Energy Research and Development Administration to develop advanced steam engines. The importance of developing advanced steam engines can hardly be exaggerated. That is the reason for this web site and for our company's presence. Advanced steam engines can be developed by any country, major industry, or major corporation that wants to and is willing to do so simply by following the sound recommendation of the U. S. Energy Research and Development Administration. The development of advanced steam engines as a contribution to human welfare would be significant and the pay-back could be rewarding. A viable "green car" can be and should be a reality.

 John Cozby  June 7, 2012

Why Steam Power for the Future?

 Presentation at:

 Sacramento, California

 Steam Meet and Technical Conference

 International Association for the Advancement of Steam Power (IAASP)

 Steam Automobile Club of America, Inc. (SACA)

California Automobile Museum - January 13 - 15, 2012

By John A. Cozby

  Why steam power for the future? Basically, because the development of advanced steam power offers a better future. The possibilities of applying steam technology to present needs are astonishing. Advanced steam power development should be one of the most exciting and sought after areas of endeavor and investigation. I am enthusiastic about steam engine development. (It is a small number of us who know and believe that steam engine development is important, but I hope and expect our number will swell.) In 1977 the United States Energy Research and Development Administration called for a major government supported program for the development of steam engines for automobiles. (Ultimately such a program was killed by the newly formed Department of Energy.) In "The STEAM AUTOMOBILE Bulletin" of March-April, 2011 reference is made to China's carefully monitored steam powered generating stations achieving 55% efficiency. (Wow!) I submit, that the same steam principles that realize 55% efficiency for China can be utilized, sized, and installed under the hoods of automobiles for us. I believe that advanced steam engine technology is the technology that can eliminate foreign oil dependence; the only technology that is truly fuel diverse; the technology that can turn our economy around and create millions of good jobs; the one that can reduce air pollution and tail pipe green house gas emissions; and the technology that can bring affordable on-site electrical power to remote areas. This present "Steam Power Meet" may be one of the most important meetings of this year --- perhaps this decade --- for America and the world. Are you excited? I certainly hope so.

    In spite of and at the risk of sounding overly simplistic; We need to do what's being done that has proven to be successful! Let me repeat We need to do what's being done that has proven to be successful! Yes, this basically means to copy the best modern steam practice employed in highly efficient electrical power plants --- in small scale, with advanced piston expanders, that is, steam engines. Now, I know this is hard for some people to wrap their head around, but it is the best that I can come up with. I can assure you that if we won't do it, then China certainly will. I don't know if what I've got to say will make any difference or have a positive impact. I may just be bringing a fire storm of controversy down upon my head. I have been told: "What you are saying is right by the book", but then have it implied or out-right stated, "but the book isn't right". I have been told that it's right according to Rankine cycle technology, but that the Rankine cycle doesn't even apply today. I have also read some self proclaimed "authorities" that reject proven effective and efficient means. These lines of reasoning seem wrong and weird to me. I propose that we at least try it by the book and by the principles of established Rankine cycle technology. It will take a lot of dedicated united people working together in a concerted effort for the common goal of modern steam power to achieve success.

  Abstract for my presentation at the SACA/IAASP Steam Meet and Technical Conference to be held in Sacramento, California, January 13 - 15, 2012 John A. Cozby

  A brief personal history of our interest and work. Express the present lack of government interest or support and its negative and deleterious effect on development and capital. Present what I believe to be the three main tools for advanced Rankine cycle engine development design, namely: 1) Engineering books that deal with Rankine technology and have a strong emphasis on steam engines, and include applicable formulas; 2) Steam Tables; and 3) a good Mollier Chart. I will bring examples. Mention our patent and our contract with DNRC of Montana. Address the issue of our experience with "machinable ceramics" and ceramics --- “ good or bad? Review advanced power station practice of the 1950's, 1990's, and present. Present our basic design approach to the technology, i.e.: multistage, reheat, counter flow, piston steam engine/system using; high pressure, high super-heat, high re-heat, high expansion ratio, low exhaust pressure, recuperation and regeneration, bleeding for feedwater heating, low valve clearance, low back pressure (vacuum), dry steam, separate oil and steam, control engine power by injection valve cut-off timing, high out put option by boiler pressure by-pass to the second stage, engine "off" and engine braking system, engine reversing option, valve motion advance for high speed operation, size from small to large (garden tractors and motorcycles to locomotives, power generation, and ships), three stage and four stage, incorporating a flywheel, aiming for about 2,500 feet per minute piston speed, and utilizing a transmission for vehicles. Introduce our website. Thank our sponsors.

cozincmtusa.com

ABSTRACT

SACA/IAASP Steam Meet and Technical Conference

Sacramento California

January 13 - 15, 2012

John Cozby

1. Brief personal history

2. Lack of government support and capital

3. Three main tools

 a. Engineering Books

 b. Steam Tables

 c. Mollier Chart

4. Our patent and DNRC work (Montana, MSE, RBIC)

5. Ceramics

6. Power station practice 

 a. 1950's

 b. 1990's

 c. present

7. Our approach

8. Our Website (cozincmtusa.com)

9. Thank "Meet" sponsors

Copyright 2012 COZBY ENTERPRISES, INC.. All rights reserved.

Web Hosting by Yahoo!
P. O. Box 1104
Anaconda, MT 59711
ph: 4065635186
alt: 4065600118
fbcanaconda@yahoo.com

Definition

Best Rankine engine / ˈraɳ - kən/  1:a highly efficient advanced steam engine system.  2: The best Rankine engine system is a closed loop or closed circuit arrangement; that is, a closed path followed by a fluid in a mechanical system.  The fluid is water/steam.  Water is pumped from a holding tank (hot well) through a recuperator and regenerative feedwater heaters into an economizer and from thence into the boiler.  The system incorporates a furnace which heats a monotube boiler, super heater, and multiple receiver/reheaters.  The boiler changes the water to steam.  The system uses steam at a high initial pressure and high super heat.  The fluid (steam) expands through a three stage (triple) or a four stage (quadruple) expansion counter flow  engine with reheating between stages.  The steam expands greatly (has a high expansion ratio).  As the steam expands it moves pistons which turn a crankshaft to produce rotative power for useful work.  As the steam expands the pressure decreases.  The steam is kept dry (super heated) until it is exhausted from the engine.  The steam is exhausted at low pressure and flows through a recuperator which heats feedwater on its way to the economizer.  A centrifugal exhauster may be employed.  The exhaust steam is then condensed back to liquid water in the condenser. [Steam collapses as it condenses, maintaining vacuum.]  The condensate (water) then returns to the hot well.  A vacuum is maintained in the recuperator, condenser and hot well and also in the engine crankcase.  There is a regenerative feedwater heater bleed at the upper end of each receiver/reheater (before reheating begins).  Air and fuel preheat is provided.  In vehicle applications the best Rankine engine employs a flywheel, clutch, and transmission (or the equivalent).  Best efficiency is gotten with early steam cut-off in the first stage, and running at relatively high speed.  Engine speed and power is by cut-off to the first stage.  Valve timing is by cams and automatically advances at higher r.p.m.  For vehicles, neutral, brake, and reverse modes are provided.  For high torque requirements an interceptor valve (to change the engine temporarily to a compound) is provided.  Steam generation and steam properties are automatically controlled.

Best Rankine engine is easy to understand and production is by standard present technology.  America needs the best Rankine engine.  An engine that does not measure up to the above criteria is not a best Rankine engine.  Deficient designs and mistakes of the past should not be repeated.  There are many steam engines that “work”, but are not the best.

John A. Cozby
Nov. 28, 2012
cozincmtusa.com

SIXTEEN  POINT CHECK LIST

Basic Elements of a High Efficiency Closed Loop Steam Engine System

1.     High pressure steam (3,000 psi and above range)

2.     High temperature steam (1,200˚ F range)

3.     Multiple stages (3 or 4)

4.     High temperature steam reheats (1,200˚ F range, 2 or 3 reheats)

5.     Truly high expansion ratios (similar to power plants’)

6.     Vacuum exhaust (1 to 2 psia range, similar to power plants’)

7.     Minimum valve clearance

8.     Adequate lubrication

9.     Tight sealing

10.    Regenerative, recuperative, economizing feedwater heating

11.    Crankcase vacuum

12.    Oil cooling (keep oil in the 100˚ to 150˚ F range)

13.    High efficiency furnace, monotube boiler and reheaters (over 90%)

14.    High efficiency condenser

15.    Exhaust expeller

16.    Air and fuel recuperative pre-heating

Getting it right is not difficult, but necessary if good economy is desired.

Advantages of High Pressure Multi-stage Reheat Steam Engines
[Assuming the multi-reheat engines are designed and built right]
John A. Cozby       December 13, 2012

I.  Stages of steam engine designs [bears little relationship to the number of cylinders employed]
     1.  One stage (single stage or simple)[most uniflow engines]
     2.  Two Stage (compound)
     3.  Three Stage (triple)
     4.  Four stage (quadruple, or “quad”)
II.  The two designs dealt with here
     1.  Triple with reheating between each stage (two reheats)
     2.  Quadruple with reheating between each stage (three reheats)
III.  Erroneous opinions in support of single stage engines (prejudice for single stage engines)
     1.  Single stage engines are good enough (for what?)
     2.  Why would you need more than one stage? (Implying multi staging is superfluous)
     3.  Single stage is as good or better than multi-stage
     4.  Should go back to the “Stanley” engines
IV.  Erroneous opinions opposing multi-stage engines (prejudice against multi stage engines)
     1.  They are too complex
     2.  They are too expensive
     3.  They are too sluggish
     4.  Fanciful, won’t get high efficiency

Following advantages of high pressure multi-stage reheat steam engines:
V.  Advantage of high efficiency (great expansion by stages)
     1.  Will get high efficiency
     2.  Will get three or more times the mileage of the “Stanley”
     3.  Will approximate power plant efficiencies (have to do what power plants do; that easy)
VI.  Advantage of smaller furnace/boiler
VII.  Advantage of smaller condenser
VIII.  Advantage of less load on auxiliaries
IX.  Advantage of smaller fuel and water tanks
X.  Advantage of better utilizing higher pressure steam
XI.  Advantage of lower piston loads
XII.  Advantage of good efficiency at high loads
XIII.  Advantage of good lubrication and sealing
XIV.  Advantage of more uniform cylinder temperature
XV.  Advantage of not mixing oil and steam/water

The triple engine is best suited for automotive applications.  The quadruple is better suited for larger applications.  The quad runs at higher pressures.  The quad has higher expansion ratios.  The quad has an additional reheat.  The quad has an additional regenerative feedwater heater.  The quad is more efficient.  But, the quad is larger, more complex, and more expensive.

There are some valuable advantages to multi stage reheat steam engines.